Agentic AI Comparison:
Genspark Super Agent vs Lindy.ai

Genspark Super Agent: 7

Genspark’s Super Agent autonomously decomposes user goals into smaller jobs, runs them across multiple specialist agents, and aggregates the results into editable Sparkpages, which shows a meaningful level of autonomous orchestration for research and content tasks. However, its autonomy is mostly bounded to generating and refining documents and basic task automation, with less emphasis on continuous, event‑driven workflows across external systems.

Lindy.ai: 9

Lindy agents can autonomously run multi‑step workflows such as lead sourcing, outbound email outreach, call handling, CRM field updates, ticket triage, and follow‑ups, triggered directly from tools like email, web chat, or telephony. Its drag‑and‑drop workflow builder, ability to act in real time (e.g., live email replies, phone support, meeting notes), and deep integrations allow agents to operate as semi‑independent workers embedded in business processes, which reflects a higher degree of practical autonomy than Genspark’s primarily document‑centric flows.

Genspark Super Agent: 8

Genspark is designed around entering a natural‑language goal and receiving structured Sparkpages, with in‑interface editing, refinement requests, and no‑code personal agents for repetitive workflows. For users primarily seeking research briefs, slides, and pages, this goal‑and‑page metaphor is straightforward and requires minimal setup, though configuring broader business automations can be more limited compared with specialized automation tools.

Lindy.ai: 9

Lindy emphasizes non‑technical usability via a drag‑and‑drop visual workflow builder, natural‑language configuration of AI agents, and many ready‑made templates for common business use cases such as sales outreach, support, and meeting notes. Its templates and point‑and‑click integrations allow users to get end‑to‑end workflows running in minutes without coding, covering more complex automations than Genspark while still keeping the interface approachable.

Genspark Super Agent: 7

Genspark provides a mixture‑of‑experts Super Agent, editable Sparkpages, and custom no‑code agents, along with 80+ integrations and use cases spanning research, content, data analysis, and some workflow automation. Nonetheless, independent reviews note that it “sits somewhere in the middle,” not being a full automation platform and lacking many of the niche or large‑scale integrations and capabilities offered by dedicated automation tools like Lindy or Copy.ai, which constrains its flexibility for complex operational workflows.

Lindy.ai: 10

Lindy is described as “the most flexible Genspark alternative,” with support for 4,000+ third‑party platforms, highly configurable AI agents, and templates covering sales, support, recruiting, clinical documentation, content, and more. Features such as HIPAA compliance, omnichannel communication (email, calls, chat), CRM and billing integrations, and the ability to design arbitrary workflows from prompts or visual blocks make it adaptable to a wide range of business and industry‑specific scenarios beyond what Genspark currently targets.

Genspark Super Agent: 8

Both Genspark and Lindy use credit‑based pricing models, and Genspark positions itself as a cost‑effective way to get in‑depth research outputs, briefs, and pages without hiring specialists or stacking multiple tools. Reviews indicate that for users whose primary need is generating high‑quality written outputs (briefs, slides, reports), Genspark delivers good value, particularly compared with per‑seat marketing tools; however, its limited automation and integrations mean that cost efficiency may drop for teams seeking broader business process coverage.

Lindy.ai: 9

Lindy is framed as a cost‑effective Genspark alternative for businesses, allowing automation of up to dozens of tasks per month even on entry tiers and enabling teams to offload significant manual work in sales, support, and operations. Because Lindy agents can replace or augment multiple point solutions (e.g., outreach tools, note‑taking, simple support bots) and run across thousands of integrations, the return on spend can be higher for organizations that exploit its automation depth, although its business‑oriented positioning may imply higher per‑account costs than purely individual‑focused tools.

Genspark Super Agent: 7

Genspark is recognized in AI‑tool directories and comparison sites and is cited in 2025 roundups as a notable AI Super‑Agent platform, yet it tends to appear more in lists and niche reviews than as a dominant market standard. Commentary from competitors frames it as a solid but more specialized option for users who want research outputs and Sparkpages, suggesting moderate awareness and adoption compared to leading automation platforms.

Lindy.ai: 8

Lindy is featured as a primary alternative in multiple Genspark reviews and is characterized as a strong option or “best alternative” for businesses needing AI agents to handle tasks across tools. It is also highlighted in AI‑agent and automation directories as part of the core set of widely used business‑oriented AI agent tools, indicating somewhat broader traction and name recognition in the workflow‑automation segment relative to Genspark’s research‑centric audience.