Agentic AI Comparison:
Anthropic's Claude Computer use vs Convergence Proxy

Anthropic's Claude Computer use - AI toolvsConvergence Proxy logo

Introduction

This report provides a detailed comparison between Anthropic's Claude Computer Use—a beta tool enabling Claude models to interact with computers via screen analysis and control—and Convergence Proxy, an AI-powered digital assistant for autonomous task management in enterprise settings. Metrics evaluated include autonomy, ease of use, flexibility, cost, and popularity, based on available data from comparisons and usage reports.

Overview

Convergence Proxy

Convergence Proxy, developed by Convergence (founded 2024, UK), is an enterprise-focused AI assistant using Large Meta Learning Models (LMLMs) for tasks like scheduling, email, and data entry. It emphasizes security, scalability, and workflow adaptation, with seamless integrations but limited public reviews.

Anthropic's Claude Computer use

Anthropic's Claude Computer Use, launched in beta, allows Claude AI models to perform computer tasks autonomously by observing screenshots, moving cursors, typing, and executing actions through API integration. It excels in coding, debugging, and administrative automation, with high adoption in developer and enterprise API usage showing 77-97% automation patterns.

Metrics Comparison

autonomy

Anthropic's Claude Computer use: 9

High autonomy via direct computer control (screenshots, cursor/keyboard actions) and API delegation, with 77% API transcripts showing full task automation vs. 12% augmentation; excels in directive automation rising to 39% of interactions.

Convergence Proxy: 8

Strong autonomous task handling (scheduling, email, data entry) through LMLMs that learn from interactions, designed for independent operation in enterprise environments.

Claude edges out with proven high automation rates in real API deployments; Proxy strong but lacks quantified usage data.

ease of use

Anthropic's Claude Computer use: 7

API-based integration requires developer setup for computer-use tool; low barriers for devs but needs prompting optimization and context provision.

Convergence Proxy: 8

Natural language interface for task delegation, enterprise-ready with easy adaptation to workflows and existing system integrations.

Proxy simpler for non-technical enterprise users; Claude more developer-oriented.

flexibility

Anthropic's Claude Computer use: 9

Highly flexible for any screen-based task (coding, admin); supports broad programmatic access across tasks with stable context-output scaling.

Convergence Proxy: 8

Adaptable via LMLMs to user preferences/workflows; extensive integrations (e.g., Amazon Bedrock, GooseAI) for enterprise tools.

Claude offers broader task versatility through universal computer control; Proxy excels in integrated enterprise automation.

cost

Anthropic's Claude Computer use: 7

Token-based API pricing (input/output); incentivizes optimization, with higher usage on valuable tasks despite costs; no free tier specified for computer use.

Convergence Proxy: 6

Enterprise-focused pricing not detailed publicly; both have API access but no transparent cost comparisons available.

Limited data; Claude's model shows economic viability for high-value tasks, but enterprise Proxy may incur higher setup/scaling costs.

popularity

Anthropic's Claude Computer use: 8

Strong API adoption by businesses/devs (e.g., coding/admin tasks); from established Anthropic (2021, US) with growing automation usage; 1P API insights show rapid enterprise deployment.

Convergence Proxy: 5

Newer product from Convergence (2024, UK); 0 ratings in comparisons vs. Claude's 1; limited visibility despite integrations.

Claude significantly more popular with proven enterprise traction; Proxy emerging but lower reviews/adoption metrics.

Conclusions

Anthropic's Claude Computer Use outperforms in autonomy, flexibility, and popularity, ideal for developers and API-driven automation. Convergence Proxy competes well in ease of use for enterprises but trails in established adoption and quantified metrics. Choice depends on developer vs. enterprise needs; Claude leads overall (avg. score 8.0 vs. 7.0).